<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>YourFacebookStuff &#187; Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourfacebookstuff.com/tag/deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourfacebookstuff.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Microsoft isn&#8217;t buying Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.yourfacebookstuff.com/news/why-microsoft-isnt-buying-facebook/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=why-microsoft-isnt-buying-facebook</link>
		<comments>http://www.yourfacebookstuff.com/news/why-microsoft-isnt-buying-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourfacebookstuff.com/news/why-microsoft-isnt-buying-facebook/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
When Microsoft walked away from its blockbuster bid for Yahoo, the media sought desperately to keep the news coming even when there wasn&#8217;t much left to say. That seems to be how The Wall Street Journal came up with the notion that Microsoft had approached Facebook about an acquisition. It&#8217;s not true.
Good sources at Microsoft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.yourfacebookstuff.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/facebooktshirt.jpg" alt="facebooktshirt.jpg" /></p>
<p>When Microsoft walked away from its blockbuster bid for Yahoo, the media sought desperately to keep the news coming even when there wasn&#8217;t much left to say. That seems to be how <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> came up with the notion that Microsoft had approached Facebook about an acquisition. It&#8217;s not true.</p>
<p>Good sources at Microsoft (<a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=MSFT&amp;source=story_quote_link"><font color="#004276">MSFT</font></a>, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/snapshots/3063.html?source=story_f500_link"><font color="#004276">Fortune 500</font></a>) recently have told me several things. First, that absent a shocking new development, the Yahoo pursuit really is over. Second, that there is no near-term interest in &#8220;replacing&#8221; the Yahoo deal with the purchase of another giant Internet business. Instead, smaller acquisitions of various sizes will continue over time.</p>
<p>Finally, there is virtually no likelihood of a deal soon either to buy Facebook or to increase Microsoft&#8217;s share in the popular social networking site. Facebook remains of great interest to Microsoft management, but the fact that Microsoft&#8217;s investment bankers may have contacted Facebook says little, if anything, about the true intentions of their client.</p>
<p>Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg isn&#8217;t even around these days to broker a mega-deal. He&#8217;s on a long around-the-world vacation trip, and is currently in India.</p>
<p>Last year, Microsoft paid a royal price for a tiny piece of Facebook &#8211; $240 million for about 1.6%. Much has been made of the $15 billion valuation that the deal placed on Facebook.<span id="more-24"></span></p>
<p>Interestingly, a number of others have subsequently invested in Facebook, including Hong Kong billionaire Li Kai-Shing and German venture capital group Founders Fund. Rumors have it that some subsequent investments were done at a lower valuation than the one Microsoft accepted.</p>
<p>If true, that certainly underscores the theory that Microsoft was, and probably remains, keenly interested in Facebook. If it invested at that valuation without a provision to prevent others from paying less, Microsoft must have wanted to get in the door at any cost.</p>
<p>Microsoft Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie is a friend and mentor of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and the two talk often. It&#8217;s worth remembering, too, that the investment was done in conjunction with another large deal of undisclosed size in which Microsoft sells display advertising for Facebook.</p>
<p>Long-term, Microsoft will probably seek to buy Facebook or up its stake. Here&#8217;s one key reason why: As Facebook grows worldwide, the information it collects about individuals and their activities grows as well. But search engine software like Microsoft&#8217;s cannot &#8220;crawl&#8221; this data as it could a regular website. Most of the data is available only with a password and often requires social-network &#8220;connections&#8221; to the people involved.</p>
<p>Microsoft, Google (<a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=GOOG&amp;source=story_quote_link"><font color="#004276">GOOG</font></a>, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/snapshots/11207.html?source=story_f500_link"><font color="#004276">Fortune 500</font></a>), and Yahoo &#8211; the big three of Web search &#8211; all have reasons to want to get close to Facebook so their search engines can mine the search data there. Microsoft succeeded in besting Google for the right to make a small investment last year. No doubt it will fight hard to retain that advantage.</p>
<p>But Zuckerberg, Facebook&#8217;s young founder, has no interest in relinquishing control of his pride and joy. And Facebook doesn&#8217;t really need another infusion of money right now.</p>
<p>That said, money talks. A sufficiently-high offer of, say $20 billion for the whole thing, would probably get Zuckerberg&#8217;s attention. But for now there is no reason for Microsoft to pay that much. With Yahoo (<a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=YHOO&amp;source=story_quote_link"><font color="#004276">YHOO</font></a>, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/snapshots/10867.html?source=story_f500_link"><font color="#004276">Fortune 500</font></a>) it would have gotten the world&#8217;s largest collection of online advertising inventory. Facebook is still figuring out how to make money out of the collective activity of its 70 million active members.</p>
<p>But perhaps another option presents itself to Microsoft. This week News Corp. executive Peter Chernin, in explaining slower-than-expected growth at company&#8217;s MySpace business, was downbeat about the challenges of selling advertising on social networks.</p>
<p>MySpace is still the world&#8217;s largest social network, and it is especially strong in the United States. Perhaps now News Corp. (<a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=NWS&amp;source=story_quote_link"><font color="#004276">NWS</font></a>, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/snapshots/6213.html?source=story_f500_link"><font color="#004276">Fortune 500</font></a>) would be willing to sell it. For now, Google is its big advertising partner. That&#8217;s all the more reason to imagine Microsoft making a move for MySpace &#8211; when it&#8217;s finally ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourfacebookstuff.com/news/why-microsoft-isnt-buying-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
